http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6WM1-51V8Y6Y-1&_user=4777270&_coverDate=12%2F31%2F2010&_alid=1748965074&_rdoc=3&_fmt=high&_orig=search&_origin=search&_zone=rslt_list_item&_cdi=6921&_sort=r&_st=13&_docanchor=&view=c&_ct=424149&_acct=C000053978&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=4777270&md5=84151619513607acb9a79bbd3871f866&searchtype=a ( 1)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6WD9-4RWBD0D-1&_user=4777270&_coverDate=02%2F29%2F2008&_alid=1748972211&_rdoc=1&_fmt=high&_orig=search&_origin=search&_zone=rslt_list_item&_cdi=6761&_sort=r&_st=13&_docanchor=&view=c&_ct=1&_acct=C000053978&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=4777270&md5=36ef76d9ed567a163da35654b52fb921&searchtype=a (2)
This abstracts have many difference, in the structure and the content.
In the first oppsition, in the structure, we can see that in the second paper (2) we have just a summary. In the first (1) we can see that have a structure more specific. It is divided in background, materials and methods, results, conclusion.
In the second difference, the content, we have that this two discuss about humeral fractures but in the paper (1) this issue is focused in that proximal humeral fractures are attributed to osteoporosis. In the paper (2) is related to supracondylar fractures of the humerus are one of the most common fracture of childhood. therefor, them talk about fracures but differents tipes and focus.
